Kheper Home | Brado Home | Topics Index | News and Updated | Search

Chapter 6: The Tibetan After-Life

The "Bardo" or Intermediate State


previous next

The Bardo Thodel - The "Tibetan Book Of The Dead"

Like the Egyptians, the Tibetans had their "books of the dead", which were not only guidebooks for the deceased, but also magnificent spiritual writings.

The Bardo Thodel, or "Book of the Intermediate State" (popularly but inaccurately known in the West as "The Tibetan Book of the Dead") is widely and traditionally attributed to Padmasambhava, the legendary Indian Tantric master who was said to have introduced Buddhism to Tibet in the middle of the eighth century, conquering and converting all the native demons and deities in the process.

In actual fact, compilation of the Tibetan Books of the Dead involved a number of authors, working over several generations.  The present corpus, of which the popular "Tibetan Book of the Dead" is only the best known and most accessible of a large number of writings (mostly mantric and magical), dates from the 14th or 15th centuries [Detlef Ingo Lauf, Secret Doctrines of the Tibetan Books of the Dead, pp3-4, (Shambhala, Boulder, 1977)].

It is obvious that the genuine occult knowledge in the Bardo Thodel has been obscured by Buddhist Tantric iconography and symbolism: the appearance of the various Buddhas, their precise iconographic attributes, and so on. This is not to depreciate the profound knowledge of Tibetan Buddhism, but only to regret that two valid fields of knowledge could not have been retained in separate purity, rather than being mixed in an unfortunate jumble.

The Bardo-States

Central to the Tibetan concept of after-life existence is the Bardo.  The word means literally "intermediate state".  According to Tibetan esotericists, steeped as they are in Buddhist learning, all existence is nothing but a series of alternating transitional states, or "bardos".  Waking, sleeping, meditating, dying, wandering in the spirt world, reincarnating; all these are bardos.  Generally however, the term is used to designate the period from physical death to physical rebirth.  And, just as waking existence can be divided into bardos (such as waking and sleeping), so can the afterlife existence.

Basically then, the Bardo Thodel describes a distinct sequence of states (bardos) through which the individual passes through between death and rebirth.  There are three distinct stages, which are as follows:

(1) The Chikai Bardo (or hChi-kha Bar-do - a number of Tibetan letters are silent) or Intermediate period of the moment of death.  This includes the process of dying; and the dissolution of the elements (earth, water, fire, and air) that make up the physical body.  During this period one experiences the "Clear Light", one's own innate Buddha-nature.  This is therefore a very favourable moment for the attainment of Enlightenment and liberation from the wheel of rebirth.

The Tibetan account of the Chikai Bardo shows striking parallels with the so-called "Near Death Experience" of people who have died, experienced themselves floating out of their bodies, and so on, and then been revived.

(2) The Chonyid Bardo (or Chos-nidd Bar-do) or Intermediate period of visions of deities. This refers to the state where one experiences visions of deities, Heaven and Hell, Judgment, and so on.  Modern writers have been struck by the parallels with the psychedelic and psychotic states, and experiences of "astral travelling" and the "astral plane"

(3) The Sidpa Bardo (or Srid-pa'i Bar-do) or Inter-mediate period of rebirth.  During this bardo the consciousness descends and chooses a new body to be born into.  (Buddhists do not accept the existence of a single continuing entity which "reincarnates", and refer instead to the "rebirth" of the consciousness-stream in a new body).

The number of days given in the Tibetan Book of the Dead - 49 - is obviously symbolic, although the Tibetans themselves, like all people (including Westerners) who are immersed in a particular religious tradition, take it in a literal context.

Now, it is interesting to compare the Tibetan with the Egyptian, Taoist, and Kabbalistic conceptions.  The latter three speak of the personality or soul as compound, and separating into its component parts with physical death; each part going to its own world or fate.  The Tibetans only have a single soul - "consciousness" would be a better word, in view of the Buddhist denial of a single persisting entity that could be termed "soul" or "self" - but have this principle passing through a number of different experiences.  In other words, the Egyptians, Taoists, etc speak of a plurality in the being, but not in time, the Tibetans of a plurality in time, but not in the being.

Of course, this is putting it rather simplistically, since the Egyptians did have a "Judgment" just as the Tibetans did, and in both cases this is a temporal stage one has to pass through.  But basically the above generalisation holds good.


Tibetan and Hellenistic conceptions - contrasts

The psychologist Carl Jung, in his "psychological commentary" to the Evans-Wentz edition (the first English translation) of the Tibetan Book of the Dead, has observed that in this text, unlike the corresponding Western position, the sequence of states begins with the highest, the Clear Light (representing the Absolute Reality or Dharmakaya), since the moment of death is considered the highest state of consciousness.  The conscious-ness then becomes progressively degraded, finally resulting in a new physical birth.  What we have, as Jung points out, is an initiation process in reverse, describing the descent of the soul into the body, rather than, as in Christian eschatology, the ascent of the soul to God [Carl Jung, "Psychological Commentary", in W.Y. Evans-Wentz, The Tibetan Book of the Dead, p.xlix (Oxford University Press, 1960].

It seems then that the Tibetan and the Platonic-Chaldean-Mithraic Hellenistic conceptions of after-life existence are the inverse of each other.

Both speak of consciousness progressing through successive stages, but for the Tibetans this is in the form of a descent from the highest state of consciousness, the Clear Light or Dharmakaya, which is experienced at the moment of death (Chikai bardo), through the Secondary Clear Light, the Peaceful Deities, Knowledge-holding and then Wrathful Deities (Chonyid bardo), the various unpleasant psychic experiences, such as the Judgment, and finally the Choosing of a body (Sidpa bardo) in preparation for Rebirth.

In contrast, in the Platonic-Chaldean-Mithraic schema, physical existence is the lowest state of existence, and one has to painfully fight one's way up through the various successive psychic spheres or zones, until finally one attains the Celestial or Supra-celestial paradise among, or above, the Fixed Stars.  Thus the goal of the Hellenistic after-life is equivalent to the initial state of the Tibetan after-life; and the final state of the Tibetan bardo equivalent to the initial state of the Hellenistic conception: the proximity with the physical body.

The Tibetan guidance to the dead is primarily yogic; one has to realise this initial Clear Light as one's own True Nature, and by so doing merge with it, thus attaining salvation.  Failing this, one steadily slips lower and lower.  The Hellenistic, especially the Mithraic and the Gnostic, guidance is Magical: one uses specific "pass-words" to get past the Guardians at each psycho-celestial zone or sphere.  Succeeding in this, one slowly ascends higher and higher.

In a sense the Tibetan perspective is idiosyncratic and totally unique; practically every other conception of after-life existence and guidance agrees with the Hellenistic esotericists in speaking of a series of stages or barriers one must pass through in order to attain one's final goal.



Further comments

by
Andy Weisberg

I agree that the philosophy of the Bardo Thodol does seem to support the singularity of personal consciousness, and its continuity is what is being addressed in the "Book". While that might imply that a separate Divine Soul, (which I also support as something differentiated from the personal consciousness or Ka), is somewhere else, I believe that the Tibetans approach this with the notion that they are part of the same thing, as the constant exhortation to the individual is to realize that everything they encounter --- all aspects of the their unravelling personality and ego --- are all parts of the Clear Light/Void/True Essence, and that they should make every effort to remember this and merge with it.

So it seems to be an important difference if we, on the one hand, imagine the Ka going on its way and the Divine Soul going off somewhere else, more Divine and Holy, and, following one line of philosophy or another they meet again, (or do not); or on the other hand we imagine that they are always connected and part of the same thing that is realizing and understanding itself in its true nature. It's a critical distinction for me, as the work then, (in aiding one's departed loved ones as well as consciously taking part in our own awakening), is to realize and experience the reality of that truth, and escape the wheel of birth, life, death and rebirth, as opposed to just placating a separate "personality" for an undetermined period of time with an Ancestor Altar in Mahikari

A passage from the American Book of the Dead translated as "Confronting the Clear Light" at the moment of death: "...Realize that nothing is happening, and nothing ever has happened, or ever will happen. Your present consciousness is in reality unformed and void, having no qualities or characteristics. Your real nature is the Clear Light itself, and you are the Clear Light..."



Printed refernces Books and Links Web links

In Association with Amazon.com

Book in Print Secret Doctrines of the Tibetan Books of the Dead by Detlef Ingo Lauf

Book in Print Tibetan Book of the Dead by W. Y. Evans-Wentz (Editor)




previous next



Kheper index page
Topics index page
Bardo main page

Kheper Home | Brado Home | Topics Index | News and Updated | Search


Creative Commons License
Unless otherwise attributed or quoted, all text material on this page is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial license version 1.0 and version 2.0.
This license does not cover images or quoted material


images not loading? | error messages? | broken links? | suggestions? | criticism?
contact me

content by M.Alan Kazlev 2001-2005 and (Further comments) Andy Weisberg 2005
previous update 24 April 2001, last modified 6 December 2005