Various Interpretations of GaiaDr Lovelock propounded the Gaia hypothesis in a scientific manner and never intended to indicate that the Earth as a whole was self-conscious. However his ideas and his term were enthusiastically taken up by environmentalists and ecologists, neo-pagans, and "New Age" people in general, and the "Gaia-hypothesis" very swiftly entered the collective imagination. as a powerful new meme The New Age movement thus adopted the concept and added a mystical and ecological element to it; the living Earth literally is the Mother Goddess. I'm happy to accommodate both perspectives, and I don't see any contradiction between them. Science describes purely physical materialistic facts concerning the objective universe, while "mysticism" or esotericism refers to realities beyond the physical. My understanding of Gaia is that
it, or she, is alive in the way that an ant hive as a whole
is alive;
The following are some interpretations of what Gaia means and is. All are valid - although not all are acceptable to the polemical advocates of any one. Click in the image to go to that page |
|
|
The Reductionist theory of Earth |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
1.Influential Gaia,
biota influence certain aspects of the abiotic world, e.g. temperature and atmosphere. 2.Co-evolutionary Gaia
|
3.Homeostatic Gaia the biota
influence the abiotic world in a way that involves homeostatic
feedback.
the "daisyworld" simulation |
4.Teleological Gaia
atmosphere is kept in homeostasis by and for the biosphere.
5.Optimizing Gaia biota manipulate their physical environment to creat optimal conditions Omega Gaia - an interpretation of Teilhard de Chardin's evolutionary metaphysics - the Earth evolves through stages of increasing consciousness |
nature as the web of life, quantum interconnectedness, the sacred femine principle as representing the Earth - the Goddess principle as the divine consciousness immanent in the Earth and nature and life The Eco-Pagan and Eco-Pantheist position |
| worldview |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
The following conceptions of the Earth (whether Gaia, Cosmic Logos, or as Sri Aurobindo would put it, "Terrestrial Evolution") are more metaphysically radical, pertaining to the sphere of mysticism, occultism and esotericism rather than science and conventional spirituality. Nevertheless I feel for a complete understanding of Gaia it is necessary to consider them as well :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
The Earth consists of a crystal-like matrix or network of lay-lines, power points, and interacting occult forces |
Gaia as consisting of layers of existence and consciousness - moving into and out of existence through cosmic cycles |
|
The Earth as a radiant center of Light and Love, an evolution from Light to greater Light, Joy to greater Joy |
|
|
|
|
holistic/emanationist/monistic |
| Links |
Introduction
to the theory of Auteveolution - John Jay
Kineman - lucidly explains the distinction between the "weak
Gaia" vs. "strong Gaia" hypothesis, although preferring the terminology
"ecological Gaia" and "evolutionary Gaia" respectively.
Kirchner, 1991.
"The Gaia Hypotheses: Are They Testable? Are They Useful?" Chapter 6 In:
Schneider, S.H., and Boston, P.J., eds.
Scientists
on Gaia. Papers delivered at the American Geophysical Union's annual
Chapman Conference in March, 1988. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 433p.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |